Intervention remise dans le cadre des consultations publiques menées par la ville de Québec sur le plan de "mobilité durable", le 30 septembre 2010
Débilité définition
1.grande faiblesse.
2.caractère d'une chose contraire à la raison, au bon sens.
3.(psychologie) débilité mentale : faiblesse des facultés intellectuelles.
Nous assistons avec ces consultations à edifying arguments clearly reflect attacks against taxpayers and their use of their vehicle against their freedom of movement. This spread in verbiage, a language which, nauseous, as empty as the clouds or bodies shoveled by subsidized employee lobbyists parasites to our hook us taxpayers, some who are paid to come and bring their grievances, it while we the workers victims of these future plans social demotion, do not all the time between work, diapers, day care, sleep, come take one of our few days off to explain our elected officials supposed to represent us, how it is worrying to see so many vultures plotters in action.
Whether our cars cons, cons the number of rooms we can allow our future homes, what little land we will have to satisfy us to see our children grow, there is always something to destroy these great masters of environmental virtue. Of course, these vultures conspirators all have one eye on the amounts that will be "invested" to sabotage the future of our city, as has been done elsewhere, an issue to have its share of the cake, contracts and / or future reference for future issues to resolve, created through consultations "planted" as they are often monopolized by extremists.
We hear these exclamations: "Restrict the parking lot!" Moratorium! "Cut lanes!" Streetcar! "Several avenues seem already selected, plans are already in circulation, beyond the interests of the people of the silent majority, the key word est: RESTRICTIONS .
Mon père a été élevé dans Saint Sauveur. Le progrès qu'il a accompli à force de persévérance dans ses études et dans son travail avec le bond que la société a accompli entre les années 40 et 70, l'a amené à acheter une maison en banlieue pour le confort de sa famille en 1976. Promettre un retour à Saint Sauveur et aux transports collectifs à nos descendants est non seulement un net recul, mais aussi une inéquité intergénérationnelle . Ce n'est que le fantasme d'une infime minorité grano pseudo durable-équitable, c'est une imposture de les let him speak for all. theories called "progressive" Le Soleil act may very well be the ego of a right-thinking bourgeoisie Sillery but are outside our solar system when the practical life of all days Limoilou, Charlesbourg and Lac St. Charles, three places where I lived.
My wife is an immigrant, born in the Soviet Union under Brezhnev. His parents could not afford engineers to have a Lada, whose purchase price was set too high, because the communist state did not quite unproductive. A family which both parents worked, with two children, were forced to live in an apartment rather basic in concrete towers, housing distributed by the state. Of course, the apparatchiks of them had homes and Volga cars with V8 engine. We all saw after the fall of the USSR 'reds' to become green surface, such as watermelons. The ideology of totalitarian, undemocratic, survives today in fantasies RESTRICTIVE environmentalists who monopolize public space, through their ideological interests and lots of free time to conduct "outreach". Today a new tax on cars, less parking, difficult access to city center ... Tomorrow, a system that will control our lives even more for the supposed greater good of nature and a class of privileged access to power.
Yes, we are guilty to driving economic activity using our cars, in a society where institutional parasitism seems increasingly take over more and more suffocating and the thin margin maneuver that left ordinary citizens honest and helpful, family, contributing public funds.
For the makers
I make a caveat: If the citizen is used to withdraw services, remove their freedom of choice, making him always pay more for infrastructure necessary knowingly inadequate binding required to make travel in shakers as a century ago, get ready to resistance to the dictatorship being implemented.
Urban sprawl is another mild solution with disadvantages, mergers of 2002 will aid to families further away from the center and then the first ring, more and more hostile, unapproachable, overtaxed, enemies to their development.
I imagine very many people who have decided to defend himself before the repeated attacks against their standard of living, comfort, well deserved after paying taxes, municipal taxes, gasoline taxes, registration, Transit fees on registration, and parking. I suggest that once the damage done to our lives, class actions against both institutions, as against fanatics funded agencies, as well as against companies that have planted ideas to get contrats publics lucratifs, influençant le cours des décisions, ce pour perte de jouissance, atteintes aux libertés, perte de temps cumulées et permanentes.
Sur le site de la Ville de Québec, j'ai lu en entête « Se déplacer autrement », ce qui indique déjà une orientation prise...: Non, je ne veux pas me déplacer autrement... et je vous promets que je me déplacerai ailleurs si cela devient impossible au centre-ville de Québec.
L'automobile ne doit pas devenir le privilège des classes supérieures. La dictat de la lutte à l'automobile conducted by these extremists antis-liberty must be annihilated for the public good. Institutions, leaders must work for the common good, that means above all that they should take informed action for the majority, not in a fashion of the day quasi-religious expressed in the media constantly disconnected with the sauce of these theories smoking. This kind of consultation should be placed in the context that most people do not have access, did not have time and / or willingness to speak at a public meeting to be booed, look crooked, by the ayatollahs of the green lobbyists and professional mission. A Such consultation should not be a legitimization of a process that ignores the popular vote an election or a referendum on an issue as important as the ideological totalitarian drift of de-democratization of individual transport . Because beyond the rhetoric filled with beautiful sentences for environmental virtue, that is what he is talking about today.
NO to 'Green Boulevard'
Yes, maybe a streetcar
never at the expense of citizens' freedom of choice.
0 comments:
Post a Comment